Product

From asset export to defensible program โ€” without the 18-month rollout.

AIPP is a clean-core SAP application that does the unglamorous work between your asset register and your regulator: scoring risk, ranking spend, modelling budgets, and producing the evidence.

Capability by capability

Everything the budget cycle needs

๐Ÿ“ฅ

Connect & load data

Spreadsheet/CSV/JSON upload, API ingestion, or a live federated read from SAP S/4 (master stays in S/4 โ€” nothing duplicated). Data-quality scored on the way in, with incomplete records ingested rather than rejected.

๐Ÿงช

Data quality first

DAMA-weighted scoring per asset class and vertical tells you which assets you can't yet make a defensible decision about. Most planning failures are data failures, not maths failures.

๐Ÿ“Š

Risk-based prioritisation

0โ€“100 scoring from likelihood ร— consequence, with representative engines for roads/rail and configurable rules for water, sewer and electricity. IIMM 1โ€“5 condition grading throughout.

๐ŸŽš๏ธ

Prioritisation Studio

Drag weighting sliders โ€” condition, consequence, hazard, remaining life, cost-efficiency โ€” per vertical and class. The ranking re-orders live. Your engineers own the model.

๐Ÿ’ฐ

Budget what-if

"At A$X we cover Y% of the risk; at A$X+2M we cover Z%." Save scenarios, compare side by side, endorse one. The board conversation a spreadsheet can't have.

๐Ÿ“…

Multi-year planner

Constrained, treatment-aware, deferral-aware โ€” a greedy risk-per-dollar heuristic (LP/ILP is the roadmap upgrade). Picks a strong life-weighted risk-reduction-per-dollar treatment and prices escalation + risk growth on deferred work. Doing nothing has a number.

๐Ÿ“‘

Regulator packs

the Report on Infrastructure Assets, rate variation evidence annexure, AASB S2 two-scenario climate disclosure, ISO 55000 and treasury business case โ€” generated from the scored data, every figure traceable.

๐Ÿ”Ž

Decision audit

Each ranking decomposed into its factors, each run versioned and reproducible. When your auditor or a regulator asks "why?", the defensible answer is one click away.

The methodology, shown

Two charts every asset manager already thinks in

Risk scoring: likelihood ร— consequence

Illustrative โ€” every asset class runs its own version of this grid with class-specific bands.

A. Certain Likely Possible Unlikely Rare Minor Moderate Major Severe Catastrophic โ†‘ Likelihood Consequence โ†’

The efficient frontier

Illustrative โ€” the shape every real budget-vs-risk curve takes, not a specific client's numbers.

100% 0% Budget โ†’ Risk addressed Knee โ€” extra budget buys little more Value-optimised Worst-first

Architecture

Clean-core, secure, and yours

๐Ÿ—๏ธ

SAP CAP on BTP

Runs on your SAP Business Technology Platform. Clean core โ€” no modifications to your digital core. BTP is one of four deployment targets; the engines are identical on all of them.

๐Ÿ”

Secure by design

XSUAA authentication, row-level security per council, soft-delete + change-log on every write, CSP/HSTS hardened.

๐ŸŒ

Sovereign-ready

Deployable to the AU (Riverside) region for data-sovereignty and IRAP pathways. Your data stays in-country.

๐Ÿค

Honest on maturity: regulator content is "aligned / representative" until validated against your published standard at onboarding, and IRAP/SOC 2 are on the roadmap. We de-risk every engagement with a pay-on-acceptance pilot.

Watch it run on your data

Bring a roads export; leave with a ranked programme and the start of your regulator evidence pack.